GREAT HALLOWEEN FILMS
1977, 99 minutes
Rated R
This is a superior example of horror. Dario Argento did not earn his reputation as
a horror master from nothing. Suspiria follows a young woman, Suzie
(Jessica Harper), who goes to a prestigious European ballet school, but upon
her arrival, strange things start happening.
The storyline of the film is follows a familiar arc, but is
done compellingly enough that it doesn’t matter. What sets this apart from other horror films
is its energetic pace and outstanding production design, both with contribute
to the mood and scares. Argento doesn’t
go for the “slow-build” type of horror that was common for many horror films of
that time. He keeps the kills and chills
coming rapid-fire along with the gore. The
energy is really fantastic. While horror
films with slow builds often work extremely well (Psycho and Rosemary’s Baby are
two great examples), Argento’s method works quite nicely too. I am not arguing for fast-paced horror films
like people try that today by passing off constant gore as scares, but if done
right, fast-paced horror is extremely effective. Dario Argento knows that gore is not what
scares people. He knows that atmosphere
is a key component to those scares.
Argento seems to have been influenced by Roman Polanski’s direction of Rosemary’s Baby, a film thematically
very similar to Suspiria, as the
storylines and effective use of eerie atmosphere drive up the tension. But, where Polanski and Argento differ is
Polanski goes for the atmospheric slow-build (very fitting for the material and
very effective), whereas Argento goes for the constant creepy situations and
gore. Argento wants your heart rate up
the whole time and he succeeds. The technically
superb and artful camerawork contribute to this mood.
The production design of Suspiria
is something else that distinguishes it from other horror films of its time. While films like The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and Halloween used their low budgets to great effect, going for the
“less-is-more” feel, Suspiria is big
and glossy. To give the film a fever
dream look, Argento has many shots, particularly those at nighttime, lit with
bright blues, reds, greens, etc. This
lighting lends a surreal look that is particularly eerie. In addition, the wallpaper and set
decorations have a surreal, classic western European look that combine well
with the lighting. The ballet academy in
which most of the film takes place is almost more threatening than the actual
antagonist(s) because it almost becomes a character due to the bizarre and
creepy design and feel.
The score by Goblin keeps the heart rate up and the
energy going. It is a pumping score that
rarely lets up. In most other films it
would be overwhelming, but not here. The
music isn’t subtle, but neither is the movie, so they complement each other
well.
Finally, I will tell you whether Suspiria is actually scary.
Fortunately, my readers, it is.
One of the opening sequences is very suspenseful and tension-filled, so
are many other sequences around the middle.
The finale is more exciting than scary (Argento moves off of some of the
colored lighting which provides much of the mood), but it is nonetheless a very
good conclusion.
Overall, Suspiria is
one of the best horror films. With a bright-colored
color scheme, beautiful production design, a creepy score, wonderful
camerawork, and great scares, Dario Argento pulls off a rare feat. With Suspiria,
he created an artful, unsubtle, but frighteningly effective film. This is a classic that truly deserves its
reputation and should be more widely seen.
4/4
-Joshua Handler
No comments:
Post a Comment