Search Film Reviews

Friday, April 25, 2014

BAD HAIR: Tribeca Film Festival 2014 Review

Photo courtesy of Sudaca Films
BAD HAIR
(PELO MALO)
2014, 93 minutes
Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler 

Mariana Rondón's Bad Hair is a powerful, moving, daring film that is a contender for having the most powerful ending of any film at this year's Tribeca Film Festival.  Starting as an amusing, enjoyable coming-of-age story and gradually becoming darker and darker before reaching its surprising conclusion, Bad Hair is a highly unusual film that features two standout performances by Samuel Lange Zambrano and Samantha Castillo.

Bad Hair tells the story of a young boy, Junior (Zambrano), living in a slum in Venezuela who wants to straighten his head of big, curly hair.  His overbearing, harsh mother, Marta (Castillo), however, is afraid that Junior is gay and doesn't want him to straighten his hair.

Rondón's greatest achievement with this film is her uncompromising vision.  There is absolutely no sugar-coating in this film.  Rondón is completely committed to honesty, which makes this a unique vision.  If a film like Bad Hair was made in the United States, it almost certainly would've ended differently and would've been light, funny, and sentimental.  Rondón uses the slum setting to stunning effect, creating an atmosphere of claustrophobia infused with hints of beauty.

Junior isn't accepted and will likely never be accepted as gay in his community and this is a tragic fact of life that Rondón stares right in the face.  Though this film is set in Venezuela, Junior's plight is one faced by young boys and girls all over the world.  Bad Hair is a call for tolerance and acceptance.

Zambrano's performance is extraordinary.  As a child who cannot be more than 12 or 13 years of age, Zambrano gives a performance of depth, maturity, and emotion that is rarely seen in child actors.  Castillo's biggest achievement is making her nasty character sympathetic.  Marta is rough, but her horrible circumstances make her even rougher - we can't help but to feel at least a little bad for her since her husband left her, she has young children to raise, and she has to find a job.  While Marta is a tough character to feel any sympathy for, Castillo brings out the humanity in her by showing her as an overstressed human trying to go on damage control, so to speak, by hiding her son's sexuality since this would make him an outsider in their community.  While we may not agree with Marta's decisions, we can at least understand them to some extent.  The scenes that Zambrano and Castillo share are dynamite, with Zambrano holding his own against the much-older Castillo.

The cinematography for this film is evocative.  It is grainy and rough, almost like a '70s grindhouse film.  This adds texture and grit to the already-grimy slum-set film.

Overall, Bad Hair is unforgettable.  While its pace occasionally lags, that is more than made up for with its jaw-dropping performances, humane script and direction, and fantastic conclusion.  This movie has more to say than many other narrative films at this year's Tribeca Film Festival and is well worth seeking out.

3.5/4

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

FISHTAIL: Tribeca Film Festival 2014 Review

Ranch Hand Tylee Abbott herds the bulls over the ridge. 
Photographer: Joe Anderson.
FISHTAIL
2014, 61 minutes
Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler

This year's World Documentary Competition has featured a variety of different documentaries about everything from the transgender community in Puerto Rico to a group of people protecting mountain gorillas in Congo. However, no documentary in competition is quite like Andrew Renzi's hypnotic FISHTAIL, an hour-long film that documents modern day cowboys as they work through calving season at Fishtail Basin Ranch in Montana.

The only narration is a beautiful, rough recording of Harry Dean Stanton reading poetry. While this approach certainly will not please everyone, I was mesmerized throughout. The 16MM cinematography gives the film the feel of a classic western. It's faded colors and film grain make this an ode to a time gone by.

These cowboys are among the last of their kind. They are a group who thrived 150 years ago but have been slowly been dying. Renzi's film captures this sense of melancholy through Stanton's narration and the cinematography, but it is also a testament to those who live and love this rough way of life. These men rise at sunrise and work through the day caring for these animals.  Their job is their life.

Fishtail's "narrative" (if it can even be called that) is split into sections.  The section dividers are placed based on the natural progression of life on the ranch, not on some artificially constructed narrative that the filmmakers wanted to tell.  This allows the film to move smoothly and rhythmically, following the ebbs and flows of life on the ranch.


The sun-drenched, mystical cinematography by Joe Anderson ranks among the best I've seen this year.  The old-fashioned look that he created for this film is a wonderful homage to rougher revisionist westerns like McCabe & Mrs. Miller and Heaven's Gate, and this places the film firmly in the Revisionist Western genre that left out the mythologizing and glamorizing that plagued many classic Westerns of the 1930s-1950s (The Searchers being a notable exception).  

Overall, Fishtail is another masterful documentary world premiering at Tribeca.  The cinematography, direction, narration, score (by Danni Bensi and Saunder Jurrians), and just about everything else in this film work together beautifully to create a near-perfect whole.  

4/4 

Sunday, April 20, 2014

POINT AND SHOOT: Tribeca Film Festival Review 2014

Matthew VanDyke sitting in the prison cell. Photographer: Nouri Fonas 
POINT AND SHOOT
2014, 83 minutes
 Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler

Two-time Oscar-nominee Marshall Curry's Point and Shoot is a textbook example of how to make a compelling documentary.  Point and Shoot tells the story of Matthew VanDyke, an American who decided that his life needed a little adventure.  So, he set out to drive around the Arab world on a motorcycle and film his journey.  Along the way, he befriended a Libyan man, Nouri.  After VanDyke returned to America, the Arab Spring erupted and he felt as if it was his duty to fight with the rebels in Libya alongside Nouri.  Through VanDyke's footage of his travels and of the war, interviews, and vivid animated sequences by Joe Posner, Point and Shoot brings VanDyke's story to vivid life.

From the moment Point and Shoot started through the minute it ended, I was captivated.  VanDyke's story is so out of the ordinary that watching him tell the story in an interview would have been fascinating on its own.  VanDyke's footage of his travels is intimate and funny and brings his stories to life.  As interesting as that footage is, nothing compares to his war footage.  In most other documentaries about war, we must watch news footage of the conflict or footage shot by professional camera crews from the press, but in Point and Shoot, we see VanDyke's footage which is personal and emotional and has an immediacy that no news footage could ever capture.  This footage is very much like the that which comprises Jehane Noujaim's excellent documentary The Square, as that film is a first-hand, ground-level view of a revolution unfolding.

VanDyke is a great subject not only because of his story, but because of his openness with Curry.  VanDyke bares it all in front of the camera, not holding anything back.  I felt as if I had gotten to know him so well through the film that by the time the 83 minutes were over, it seemed like I knew him like a friend.

It takes a documentarian of Curry's caliber to create a documentary out of material this important and sprawling.  While the film covers a large amount of time with a lot of information, Curry managed to create a coherent story told with a relentless pace.  Most documentaries are too long and hit a point where they slow up.  However, Point and Shoot doesn't have this problem.  Through his multi-media approach, Curry crafted a compelling story that unfolds like a thriller.  We never know what's going to happen next.  The only certainty in this story is that VanDyke will live, as he is the one telling the story.

Overall, Point and Shoot is a superior documentary in every way.  It is a multi-dimensional portrait of a unique man, it is a powerful story of war, and it is an important historical document.  How many movies can one say that about?

4/4

GABRIEL: Tribeca Film Festival Review 2014

Rory Culkin in Gabriel: Courtesy Gabriel
GABRIEL
2014, 88 minutes
Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler

Lou Howe's Gabriel is a moving film that's so well-acted it was hard to believe I was watching actors.  The film centers around Gabriel (he prefers to be called Gabe), a mentally ill young man who wants to propose to his former girlfriend because he believes that that will create stability in his life.  Rory Culkin is mesmerizing as Gabe and the supporting cast is universally excellent, but Deirdre O'Connell stands out at Gabriel's mom, Meredith.

Howe's screenplay is honest, emotional, and not sentimental, though very moving.  Every tear is earned.  Howe doesn't define Gabe by his illness.  Through good and bad, Howe makes sure that we understand why Gabe is acting the way he is.  Because of Gabe's illness, his behavior is unpredictable, and this unpredictability drives each scene.

While Gabriel is very much a character study of its eponymous character, it is also an exploration of how mental illness can affect an entire family.  Howe made every character interesting and lovingly developed each and every one of them.

As mentioned, the entire cast is fantastic, but Culkin and O'Connell stand out.  Culkin's portrayal of Gabe is sensitive, human, and heartbreaking.  Culkin's work with Gabe is unique because of the many habits and idiosyncrasies that he created. While many of Gabe's actions are questionable at best, I was invested in him and cared about him throughout because of Culkin's superb work.  He earned my sympathy.

Deirdre O'Connell's portrayal of Gabe's mother, Meredith, is beautiful.  A character like Meredith would usually be underdeveloped, but Howe and O'Connell do everything they can to make her as real as possible.  By watching O'Connell, we learn volumes about Meredith.  Meredith hasn't had the easiest life, yet she is a kind, loving mother with a huge heart.  In Meredith, I saw so much of my mother and I expect many others to see their mothers in her too.

Overall, Gabriel is a multi-layered film with a stand-out lead performance, a smart screenplay, and a director who likely has a great career ahead.  This is a stand-out film in this year's World Narrative Competition at the Tribeca Film Festival and should play well with most everyone who sees it.

4/4

Saturday, April 19, 2014

THE CANAL: Tribeca Film Festival Review 2014

Photo by Piers McGrail
THE CANAL
2014, 92 minutes
Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler

Ivan Cavanaugh's The Canal is a disturbing, surreal, and well-acted film about an Irish man who begins to believe that his house might be haunted after the death of his wife.  Writing that last sentence sent shivers down my spine because of the memories that it's conjuring up.  The above is the most basic description of The Canal, but it is an apt one.  There's not much more to the story than that, but what makes this seemingly generic film stand out is the skill with which it was made.

Kavanaugh was obviously influenced by '70s horror, particularly Don't Look Now (referenced in the press notes) and Suspiria.  His use of candy-colored visuals, particularly in the film's last third, and wide slow-zoom shots are explicit references to the aforementioned films and harken back to a day when horror films were more suspense-driven.  While The Canal has a gory scene or two, most of its scares are jump scares and much of its suspense is generated from long periods of silence.

The Canal causes unease and unnerves because it teases us with surreal sequences of disturbing imagery without any explanation combined with sharp editing.  Present-day horror filmmakers feel the need to shock us with gore to make up for a lack of real thrills.  I have nothing against gore, but gore is nasty, not scary.  Filmmakers like Nicolas Roeg (Don't Look Now) and Roman Polanski (Rosemary's Baby) realized that milking suspense from their film's locations created suspense.  They saw that gore wasn't going to make their films terrifying.  Look at either film and there is little gore (save for a scene or two).  Roeg and Argento tease us with odd sound effects and surreal images, but don't reveal what they mean until the last minute.  Venice and a Manhattan apartment building became labyrinths of deception and violence in the aforementioned directors' films.  Cavanaugh uses his eerie Irish location to similar effect with similar techniques to elicit suspense.

Overall, The Canal is an unnerving horror movie that provides an excellent showcase for lead Rupert Evans and Robin Hill's editing.  The aforementioned artists' talents cannot go unmentioned, particularly Hill's, because so much of what makes this film effective is their work.  If Evans' lead performance wasn't so convincing, the movie would not have worked.  To "buy" a horror movie, so to speak, we must believe that what is happening onscreen is actually happening in that world.  If a performance is weak, we begin to laugh at the movie, and thus the realism of the film's world is broken.  The Canal is as good, if not far better, than any horror film around and should please both fans of classic horror and David Lynch.

3.5/4

Friday, April 18, 2014

MANAKAMANA Review

Courtesy of The Cinema Guild
MANAKAMANA
2014, 118 minutes
Not Rated

Review by Joshua Handler

Stephanie Spray and Pacho Velez's Manakamana takes its name from a Nepali temple.  The film is the latest produced by Harvard's Sensory Ethnography Lab, which is best-known for producing the acclaimed documentaries Sweetgrass and Leviathan.  The temple of Manakamana is located on a mountain and to get there, one must take a cable car.  Spray and Velez discovered that a roll of Super 16 film lasts as long as a cable car ride to or from Manakamana, so they went out and filmed people's trips up and down the mountain.

Manakamana is extraordinary because of the way that it puts people under a microscope to allow us to appreciate the smallest of actions or the shortest of sentences.  During one trip up the mountain, a woman, Mithu, is sitting in the cable car and holding a miniature Manakamana souvenir.  Her sullen look and shyness (I was told by co-director Stephanie Spray that this woman was really very talkative) means that she says very little throughout the cable car ride.  The one or two times she speaks, she talks about how much she likes her souvenir.  The fact that the only words that this woman says throughout the entire ride are about a simple souvenir is hauntingly beautiful.

Souvenirs are simple objects that remind us of whatever place we visited.  As interesting as they are, most people think of them as simple knick knacks.  However, Mithu saw her Manakamana souvenir as something meaningful - a little piece of happiness that she felt was good enough to talk about and share with the world.

Manakamana is a film about the small moments.  While one or two of the film's eleven sequences are fascinating throughout, most sequences are made emotionally resonant and intriguing because of the small moments like the one described above.  This is not a film for the easily bored, as minutes go by without anything of significance happening.  By showing life unfiltered and in real time, we begin to look for the moments of beauty and realize just how wonderful they are because we are forced to pay attention and to look for those moments to keep us interested.

Overall, Manakamana is a film about the beauty of human life and the small moments that we may neglect to notice in the hustle and bustle of our everyday lives.  While the film is a bit too long, it is an entrancing experience unlike any other.  For the adventurous filmgoers out there, this is a must.

3.5/4

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

An Interview with Gareth Evans of THE RAID 2

Director Gareth Evans
Photo by Akhirwan Nurhaidir and Gumilar Triyoga, Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics

An Interview with Gareth Evans, Writer/Director/Editor of 
THE RAID 2

By Joshua Handler

Gareth Evans is a one-of-a-kind auteur.  Welsh-born, but Indonesian-based, Evans has found major success with his last two films: The Raid: Redemption and The Raid 2, two hyper-violent action films that combine gun violence with Silat, a form of Indonesian martial arts.  This past Friday, The Raid 2 opened wide in the United States, and I was fortunate to talk with Evans about the film.  I loved the film and reviewed it here.

The Raid 2 takes place two hours after the first film ended.  After remaining alive through the hellish debacle that was the raid on the apartment building, Rama (Iko Uwais) must now go undercover to bring down all of the corrupt officials in the government.  He must start by befriending a crime boss' son in prison.  Evans sees The Raid: Redemption as a "survival horror film" and The Raid 2 as a "gangster film."

While The Raid 2 has a well-structured and intriguing dramatic story, the reason the film is great is its action.  Says Evans on creating the action sequences, "I'll come to [the choreographers] with...a scenario...'Well this is the fighter, these are the bad guys, this is their weapon...this is what they have, and this is what you have. This is the environment, the location, the props...the skill set of everyone involved,' and I say, 'Okay I'll be back in about 20 or 30 minutes.  You come up with six different ways to beat up six different guys...using these props, using this environment...then they'll present to me,' and then usually what'll happen is I'll start to add some of the character to it...

"There should be punchline moments in each of the fight sequences, and usually they consist of about 2 minutes, 3 minutes long, and we should have about four to five punchlines in that space and time, and the punchline is kind of like the big killshot, the big...stunt moments where people have to take a breath when they see them.  We put one in and then we slow down again then build up again...until we reach our next punchline.  The last step...is that we film everything but we film it all using a handy cam in an office space with crash mats everywhere, and we film it exactly the same as we would do it for the final film.  So I'm basically designing my shot list, I'm figuring out every angle and every edit for the fight scene so when we get to the...production stage, we have this video to use as a reference."

In addition to the stunning choreography, Evans also had to take into consideration how the action sequences built character and fit into the story as a whole.  "Whenever it came to a fight sequence, it wasn't because we were on page 10 or page 12, it was because it organically felt right to have a fight sequence in that situation.  [T]he fight sequences [also] to feel like they had a purpose beyond just the visceral thrills...


"The prison riot, for example, was something where we started off by setting up the paranoia in the character, and then...maybe he's going to come under attack, then realizing that he's not the target...of the attack - it's the guy that he's supoosed to be getting close with that's under attack, and if he gets killed then his whole mission is ruined...and so he ends up having to become bodyguard and protector of that guy because otherwise he's going to have to rot in prison for two to three years for no reason whatsoever...

"On the surface level it's like a seven-minute prison riot and it's spectacle, but...by the end of the scene, there's a complete change in personality in character motivation and character arc for these two guys."

For the now-famous car chase sequence, Evans and crew used CGI only for "touch-ups."  Everything else is real.  In The Raid: Redemption, there is a sequence in which the camera passes through a hole in the floor from one floor to another in a single take.  Evans said he wanted to do the same thing again,  but this time between two cars.  "Let's just try it and if we do it and the behind-the-scenes footage is good, you look like a fucking hero," said Evans to co-director of photography Matt Flannery.  The only CGI used in that sequence is during the shot in which the camera passes between the two cars - the door was added in digitally.


With The Raid 2, Evans wanted to question how far are we willing to follow the hero through sadistic acts.  "When I was a kid growing up, whenever I'd watch action films with my dad," recalled Evans,  "my dad [would] always be the...guide in terms of...what was acceptable...and what was unacceptable."  If Evans' dad deemed something unacceptable, he would send the kids out of the room.  "Violence can be visceral and be aggressive.  It can be...an entertainment thing...but the part where [Evans' dad]...drew the line was cruel violence...and I think what we do is kind of obscure the line a bit...If somebody's...impacted in some way, it's not about...holding on that shot to see all of the pain and suffering that that person's going through...it's usually about a real quick, sharp, shocking moment of...violence that kind of takes your breath away for a second before we cut away then to show something else...By focusing on...those breathtaking moments as opposed to those scenes that make you feel like you want to wretch...by keeping on having those breathtaking moments, it creates this sort of communal atmosphere of...shock without people hopefully being repulsed by the film."

Many will be repulsed by The Raid 2, but even more will be thrilled by the beautifully-shot and choreographed action sequences, the well-developed characters, and the overall craft of the film.  The Raid 2 is now open across the United States.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

What to See at the 2014 Tribeca Film Festival

Courtesy TFF
WHAT TO SEE AT THE 
2014 TRIBECA FILM FESTIVAL

By Joshua Handler

This year's Tribeca Film Festival begins this Thursday, April 17 and ends April 27.  As with just about any film festival, the selection is a mixed bag.  I have seen 19 films, roughly about half of which have been good to great.  So, to save you from the horrible movies, I will tell you what I consider to be worth the ticket price.  I will say that I haven't seen Love is Strange, Gabriel, Land Ho!, Art and Craft, and a few others that I have heard are excellent.

The Best:

VENUS IN FUR (Dir. Roman Polanski) - Venus in Fur is Roman Polanski's film adaptation of David Ives' twisted play about an actress who does everything she can to convince a director that she's right for the lead role in his new play.  Emmanuelle Seigner and Mathieu Amalric star and they and Polanski are all in top form.  Venus in Fur is a funny, racy, dark drama that I believe to be the best of the fest.  The film hits theaters on June 20.

STARRED UP (Dir. David Mackenzie) - David Mackenzie's prison drama Starred Up has already garnered an enormous amount of critical acclaim and deserves all of it.  The film stars Jack O'Connell and Ben Mendelsohn and tells the story of a young man who's put in the same maximum security prison as his father.  Gritty, intense, violent, profane, and moving, Starred Up is a great piece of work and, like Venus in Fur, features two outstanding lead performances.  The film will be released theatrically in August.

FISHTAIL (Dir. Andrew Renzi) - This film is embargoed, but let me say that this is a work of jaw-dropping beauty and poetry.  Fishtail is a documentary that shows life on a Montana cattle ranch during calving season.  At 60 minutes, it's the perfect length and Harry Dean Stanton's poetry readings are beautiful.  Full review to be published soon.

THE ONE I LOVE (Dir. Charlie McDowell) - This film is also embargoed so my thoughts will be brief.  The One I Love premiered to great acclaim at Sundance and requires you to know next to nothing about it when going in.  The most basic synopsis won't do the film justice, but I'll give one anyway.  The One I Love stars Mark Duplass and Elizabeth Moss and tells the story of a couple whose marriage is on the rocks.  Their therapist tells them to go out to a vacation spot, and when they get there something very interesting happens.  This sounds like every other marriage comedy, but trust me, after viewing for 20 minutes, you'll see that its not.  It's smart, funny, honest, and very clever.

Worth the ticket price:
BRIDES
HUMAN CAPITAL


Saturday, April 12, 2014

AFFLICTED Review

Derek Lee in AFFLICTED
Photo courtesy of CBS Films
AFFLICTED
2014, 85 minutes
Rated R for disturbing bloody violence, and language

Review by Joshua Handler

Afflicted marks the feature directorial debut of Clif Prowse and Derek Lee, and while not the most inventive or terrifying horror film ever, it is very fun with a healthy sense of humor and just enough originality to make it worth a watch.

Derek and Clif (the directors of the movie are are the leads) are best friends and decide to take a trip around the world, filming the entire thing for their blog.  One night in France, Derek meets a girl at a bar and takes her back to his hotel room.  Derek and a few friends come back to the hotel room later to find that Derek has open wounds on his body.  Derek and Clif discover that Derek has contracted some form of horrifying disease that keeps getting worse as the time wears on.

What makes Afflicted so entertaining is the fact that it rarely ever takes itself seriously and creates a monster that's original and very human.  Prowse and Lee have obviously had a ball making this film.  Their chemistry onscreen gives the film's first horror-free half a laid-back mood that makes it extremely enjoyable to watch.  The two seem like typical guys that you'd see everyday on the street, making them instantly relatable.

The second part of the movie is not quite as funny as the first part and focuses more on horror than comedy, though it isn't scary.  However, it is still fun and features some nice scenes of gore.  The acting continues to be strong and the film arrives at a clever conclusion.

Overall, Afflicted is a solid horror film from two directors who have bright careers ahead of them.  After a slew of horrible horror films, it's very refreshing to see one that is as well-directed, acted, and scripted as this one.  Horror and non-horror fans should enjoy this.

3/4

BULLETS OVER BROADWAY to Screen at FSLC with Stroman, Aronson, Schlossberg Q&A


FROM SCREEN TO STAGE: 
BULLETS OVER BROADWAY 
Susan Stroman, Letty Aronson, 
and Julian Schlossberg in Conversation

By Joshua Handler

The stage adaptation of Woody Allen's Bullets Over Broadway recently opened in NYC, so to celebrate the opening, the Film Society of Lincoln Center is presenting a screening of a 35MM archival print of the film followed by a conversation with acclaimed stage director Susan Stroman (The Producers, Bullets Over Broadway) and producers Letty Aronson (Allen's sister and longtime producer) and Julian Schlossberg on May 5.  

The film Bullets Over Broadway was nominated for 7 Oscars including Best Director for Woody 
Allen, won one for Best Supporting Actress (Dianne Wiest), and stars (alongside Wiest) John Cusack, Jim Broadbent, Harvey Fierstein, Chazz Palminteri, Mary-Louise Parker, Rob Reiner, Jennifer Tilly, and Tracey Ullman. I love the movie and am looking forward to viewing it again.  The Film Society of Lincoln Center's press release is below.

-FSLC logo revised 1210
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
THE FILM SOCIETY OF LINCOLN CENTER TO PRESENT 
FROM SCREEN TO STAGE: BULLETS OVER BROADWAY
ON MAY 5

INCLUDES A SCREENING OF AN ARCHIVAL PRINT OF WOODY ALLEN’S ACADEMY AWARD®–WINNING BULLETS OVER BROADWAY

FOLLOWED BY A CONVERSATION WITH TONY-WINNING DIRECTOR/CHOREOGRAPHER SUSAN STROMAN AND PRODUCERS LETTY ARONSON AND JULIAN SCHLOSSBERG
 
New York, New York (April 11, 2014) – The Film Society of Lincoln Center has announced today a one-night-only event, From Screen to Stage: Bullets Over Broadway, on Monday, May 5 at 6:30PM. The evening will include a screening of an archival print of Woody Allen’s rollicking Oscar®-winning jazz-age ensemble comedy Bullets Over Broadway, followed by a conversation with five-time Tony-winning director/choreographer Susan Stroman and lead producers Letty Aronson and Julian Schlossberg. The event celebrates the April opening of Bullets over Broadway: The Musical, starring Zach Braff and Marin Mazzie, at the St. James Theatre.

The May 5 conversation will be moderated by Kent Jones, the Director of the New York Film Festival, and will address the creative process of turning a movie into a musical, touching on the pleasures as well as the pitfalls of this particular transformation, including plenty of backstage stories. Following the discussion, the audience is invited to a reception in the Frieda and Roy Furman Gallery. Print is courtesy of The Museum of Modern Art, New York. A special thank you to Theatre Communications Group for hosting this evening and Roy Furman.

Allen’s 1994 Bullets Over Broadway marks the first-ever Centerpiece selection of the New York Film Festival and is a tale of life in the theater during the very Roaring Twenties, populated with gangsters, showgirls, and other colorful personalities. Along with Dianne Wiest (who won the Oscar® in 1995 for Best Actress in a Supporting Role), as a diva who devours all in her path, and John Cusack, as an idealistic playwright, Jim Broadbent, Harvey Fierstein, Chazz Palminteri, Mary-Louise Parker, Rob Reiner, Jennifer Tilly, and Tracey Ullman make up the outstanding ensemble cast that helped the film become a classic. The film was nominated for 7 Academy Awards® in 1995, including Best Director for Woody Allen, Best Original Screenplay for Allen and Douglas McGrath, Best Actor in a Supporting Role for Chazz Palminteri, and Best Actress in a Supporting Role for both Dianne Wiest and Jennifer Tilly.

The screening will take place on Monday, May 5 at 6:30PM at the Walter Reade Theater, 165 West 65th Street. Tickets go on sale today, Thursday, April 10. Admission is $13; $9 for students and seniors (62+); and $8 for Film Society members. Visit FilmLinc.com for more information.


Film Society of Lincoln Center
Founded in 1969 to celebrate American and international cinema, the Film Society of Lincoln Center works to recognize established and emerging filmmakers, support important new work, and to enhance the awareness, accessibility, and understanding of the moving image. The Film Society produces the renowned New York Film Festival, a curated selection of the year's most significant new film work, and presents or collaborates on other annual New York City festivals including Dance on Camera, Film Comment Selects, Human Rights Watch Film Festival, LatinBeat, New Directors/New Films, NewFest, New York African Film Festival, New York Asian Film Festival, New York Jewish Film Festival, Open Roads: New Italian Cinema and Rendez-Vous with French Cinema. In addition to publishing the award-winning Film Comment magazine, The Film Society recognizes an artist's unique achievement in film with the prestigious Chaplin Award. The Film Society's state-of-the-art Walter Reade Theater and the Elinor Bunin Munroe Film Center, located at Lincoln Center, provide a home for year-round programs and the New York City film community.

The Film Society receives generous, year-round support from Royal Bank of Canada, Jaeger-LeCoultre, American Airlines, The New York Times, Stella Artois, the Kobal Collection, Trump International Hotel and Tower, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the New York State Council on the Arts.

For more information, visit www.filmlinc.com and follow @filmlinc on Twitter.